The European Parliament’s latest reforms to air passenger rights have pushed flight delays and compensation back into public focus.
At a headline level, the message sounds reassuring.
Passenger protections remain intact. Delay thresholds haven’t been weakened. Airlines are still responsible for refunds, rebooking, and duty of care when flights go wrong, under frameworks such as EU261 (European Commission overview).
But for anyone who actually travels, or sells travel, events, or experiences, there’s a growing disconnect between what regulation covers and what disruption really costs.
Getting compensation for a delayed flight rarely comes close to covering what passengers actually lose.
Under EU air passenger rights, travellers may be entitled to:
These protections matter. They address fairness in air transport.
What they don’t address is everything built around the flight.
In modern travel, the flight is just the trigger.
When a flight doesn’t depart on time, or doesn’t depart at all, the knock-on effects are immediate and expensive.
Common losses include:
Even when airline compensation is paid, it is:
A £250–£600 payout offers little comfort if the traveller has missed:
Travel today is no longer a single transaction. It’s an interconnected ecosystem of bookings:
In reality, responsibility is fragmented across airlines, hotels, event organisers, insurers, and platforms. When disruption happens, customers are left navigating that fragmentation themselves.
That’s when frustration spikes, and so do chargebacks, disputes, and support tickets.
|
Area impacted by delay |
Covered by airline compensation |
Common real-world outcome |
|
Flight ticket |
Yes |
Refund or rebooking |
|
Meals and accommodation |
Sometimes |
Limited, capped, or delayed |
|
Airport transfers |
No |
Cost absorbed by customer |
|
Hotel nights |
No |
Often non-refundable |
|
Events or attractions |
No |
Missed entirely |
|
Business or once-only events |
No |
Irrecoverable loss |
The gap is structural, not accidental. Regulation was designed to govern transport, not attendance.
This is where the conversation needs to move, particularly for:
The real question is no longer: Will the airline refund the flight?
It’s: What happens when a customer can’t attend what they booked?
Simple Refunds is designed specifically for the part of disruption that regulation doesn’t touch.
It doesn’t replace airline compensation. It complements it. If a customer can’t attend a booking because their flight is delayed or fails to depart, Simple Refunds covers the inability to attend, not just the transport, but the experience that depended on it.
That includes protection for:
Even if a customer later receives airline compensation, they’re no longer left absorbing the real loss themselves.
For businesses selling travel, events, or experiences, attendance-based protection delivers tangible value:
The EU’s reforms are a step forward. They reinforce fairness in air travel. But regulation alone can’t reflect how people travel or buy today.
The future of protection sits at the intersection of:
And it starts by protecting attendance, not just transport.